Category Archives: Open Data

Open Access Publishing–Policies, Requirements and Avoiding the Predators

It’s no secret, the word is out:  Academic publishing has hit the open access high-water mark. To emphasize the importance of providing open access to research findings, a Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications has been established, which outlines a set of policy requirements for those applying for, and receiving Tri-Council funding. The policy requires grant applicants to include their plans for open access publishing and dissemination, and data management. The Tri-Agency policy also requires grant holders to make their research findings accessible to all via open access journals and repositories once that research is funded. It’s a subject worth taking a closer look at, as the world of academic research and funding agencies are most certainly adopting open access plans and processes at a rapid pace. These developments have prompted researchers and authors to consider where and how to make their publications openly accessible. Reputable and distinguished open access journals are out there, but at the same time, there are tons more that appear to be legitimate journals, but upon closer inspection they aren’t worth your time or your money. The journals (open access or print) that fall in the latter category are often billed as predatory journals or vanity publishers. Their main intent is to publish as many articles and journals as they possibly can, and take the money and run. Often, the editorial boards are suspect and many don’t incorporate a true peer-review process, which can lead to all sorts of problems for the author down the road, including how these publications will look to the eyes of a future grant review panel.

One way to avoid the predatory publisher is to begin by conducting your own investigation and evaluation. Below you will find some resources compiled by Western Libraries that will help you make an informed decision on where to find the most reputable open access publisher.

The following questions can be used as guidelines when you are evaluating open access journals.

Publisher level
Is the publisher a member of Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)?OASPA consists of a group of open access publishers, which are recognized for promoting and advocating open access publishing. Please see the list of OASPA members here. Newer publishers are not listed in OASPA, so it will be more appropriate to evaluate them based on their reputation in the related academic community.

Is the publisher a questionable open access publisher? Jeffrey Beall, an academic librarian at the University of Colorado Denver has compiled a list of predatory scholarly open access publishers in his blog. See his criteria for determining predatory open access publisher (2ndedition) here.

What is the mandate of the publisher of the journal? Is it for-profit or not-for-profit? The mandate of the publisher often can be found on their website. Not-for-profit publishers may have deeper commitment to open access, as they focus on scholarship and the dissemination of information rather than profit.

Journal level

Is the journal listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)? DOAJ has an established quality control process to ensure the quality of the journals being included. For the selection criteria, please refer to their webpage.

Does the journal have an impact factor? How high is the impact factor? For some newer open access journals, impact factor may not be available.

Are the peer review guidelines posted on the journal’s website? Is it a blind peer review (or anonymous peer review) in which the reviewers’ and author’s identities are kept secret from each other? Or is it an open peer review in which the identities of the reviewers are transparent to the author? Blind peer review is traditionally considered as the trademark for scientific publishing.

How qualified is the editorial board of the journal? You can check the editorial board members’ profiles if they are available on the journal’s site, or you can do some research on their research backgrounds on the Internet.

Is the journal indexed in major databases or index services? Check Ulrichs Global Serials Directory and sometimes the journal’s website for that information.

How many issues have been published since the journal started? It is useful to review the current and past issues of the journal to get a quick snapshot of the publication history of the journal.

Article level

Check the authors of several articles published in several issues. Are these articles written by a single author or different authors? This can help to see the pool of article submittors of the journal.

Scan through some articles published in several issues. Does the content make sense? Are the articles well-written?

If the author is listed with some affiliation, check the affiliation’s background. If it is an institution or a university, is the affiliated institution or university a reputable one? Does it have a program in the field the article is written about? Check their website for this kind of information.

Check the total cites (number of times being cited by others) for some articles published in several issues. Are these articles being cited reasonably frequently by others in the field, given the time since they were published? There are different places where you can check the total cites for articles. Web of Science has total cites if the article is indexed there. If you need help finding this information, you can contact a subject librarian.

Additional resources:

New Open-Access Social Science Research Archive

A team of sociologists and librarians in partnership with the Center for Open Science, will develop a new open-access archive for social science research. The archive, called SocArXiv, will let anyone upload, read and share academic papers, according to the announcement. The announcement comes less than two months after the publishing giant Elsevier said it had acquired the Social Science Research Network, a move many open-access advocates criticized.

Source: Inside Higher Ed (July 12, 2016)

For more information, visit SocArXiv.org. Follow SocArXiv on Twitter or Facebook.

Tri-Agency Statement of Principles: Digital Data Management

Canada’s three federal research granting agencies—the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and SSHRC—have adopted the Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management as an important step towards strengthening research data management in Canada and maintaining Canada’s research excellence.

The Statement is the result of targeted community engagement, and will serve as the basis for the continuing work of the agencies on the renewal of their data management policies. It recognizes that different stakeholders in Canada’s research system have different roles and responsibilities, and that all parts of the system must work together in order to ensure that Canada maintains international best practices in the preservation, accessibility and reuse of research data.

What is the Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management?

The Statement outlines the agencies’ overarching expectations for research data management and the roles of researchers, research institutions, research communities, and research funders in supporting data management. It complements and builds upon existing agency policies, and will serve as a guide to assist the research community in preparing for, and contributing to the development of, Tri-Agency data management requirements. The Statement itself does not include mandatory requirements.

Because the research data management environment continues to evolve, the agencies will continue stakeholder engagement and review and revise the Statement as appropriate.

Learn more about the tri-agency data management initiative, and read the Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management, at science.gc.ca.

Research Metrics and Scholarly Communication Tools available at Brescia and Western

The Beryl Ivey Library’s Scholarly Communication page provides information on the following resources open to the Brescia community: Western’s institutional repository– Scholarship@Western (open to BUC faculty), retaining your author rights, and open access resources.

Western Libraries has created a new website for Research Metrics. Research metrics provides an introduction to various metrics and tools used to evaluate and assess research productivity. Types of metrics include article, author, journal, altmetrics (alternative metrics), and social media.

 

Get a Handle on New Scholarly Communication Tools

Since 2013, many scholarly communication tools have come flooding in like an open source tidal wave. In the following blog post from LSE Impact Blog: 101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication: How researchers are getting to grip with the myriad of new tools,  the authors discuss the sheer number of scholarly communication tools that have surfaced over the past few years and provide flowcharts and analysis (based on their own survey-based research) to attempt to deduce how researchers are taking advantage of these resources. The authors suggest, “the push for new tools comes from funders (e.g. demanding data archiving of Open Access) but also from researchers themselves that want to capitalize on the possibilities of the internet in collaborating.” The blog post also includes a database of the authors’ findings, which outlines in detail the functions and features of these communication tools.

 

Information session on the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications–Presentation Now Available

The presentation from last month’s (June 2015) information session on the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications is now available. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) held information sessions for the Canadian research community on this policy.

To view a recording of the information sessions:

To download a copy of the presentations:

Please visit the main page (science.gc.ca) where these sessions are posted.

Feedback Wanted: Draft Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management

Overview
High-quality data management is fundamental to research excellence.  The ability to store, access, reuse and build upon digital research data is critical to the advancement of research and supports the discovery of innovative solutions to economic and social challenges. Digital data holds tremendous potential for Canada’s productivity and competitiveness, and for improvements in quality of life nationally and internationally.

The Tri-Agencies are committed to fostering a robust environment for data stewardship in Canada and internationally, and to helping ensure that Canada is well positioned to contribute to and capitalize on data-intensive science and scholarship. To achieve this, and while recognizing the diversity of data practices and needs within the Canadian research community, SSHRC, NSERC and CIHR are in the process of reviewing and enhancing their data management requirements for Agency-supported researchers.

As a step in this process, the Agencies have developed a draft Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management. This builds on the 2013 consultation document, Toward a Policy Framework for Advancing Digital Scholarship in Canada, information provided by a Comprehensive Brief on Research Data Management Policies, and advice received through stakeholder engagement.

The draft Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management (the Statement) outlines the Agencies’ overarching expectations with regard to digital research data management, and the responsibilities of researchers, research communities, institutions and funders in meeting these expectations. It complements and builds upon existing Agency policies, and will serve as a guide to assist the research community in preparing for, and contributing to the development of, Tri-Agency data management requirements.

Feedback
SSHRC, NSERC and CIHR invite institutions, associations, organizations and individuals to comment on the draft Statement, its comprehensiveness and balance, as well as its usefulness in advancing data stewardship in general and data management practices in particular. The HTML version is accessible here, and the PDF version is accessible here.

Please note that the Agencies will be accepting feedback on the draft Statement until September 4, 2015. Feedback can be sent electronically to any of the following email addresses:
researchdata@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca
researchdata@nserc-crsng.gc.ca
researchdata@cihr-irsc.gc.ca

Please indicate the section(s) of the draft being referred to in your feedback.

Next Steps
By the end of 2015, SSHRC, NSERC and CIHR will revise the Statement as appropriate and formally adopt it. In 2016, they plan to engage the research community to seek advice on realizing the principles expressed in the draft Statement, particularly with a view to developing new data management requirements.

University Affairs article: What does the new tri-agency open access policy mean for researchers?

On April 28, 2015, University Affairs magazine published a nice, concise article on the new tri-agency open access policy. The new policy came into effect May 1st. In this article, the authors outline the basic Open Access (OA) options available to researchers: the “green” option, the “hybrid journal-gold” option, and the full “gold” option.

You can read the full UA article here:
“What does the new tri-agency open access policy mean for researchers?”

 

 

 

 

 

New Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications

In a February 27 press release, Minister Holder formally announced the newly approved Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications.  The policy, which has been in draft stages for some time, will require grant-holders funded by one of the three federal granting agencies to make their peer-reviewed journal publications freely available online within 12 months. The three federal granting agencies include: the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). The policy will require NSERC and SSHRC funded researchers to comply with the policy for all grants awarded May 1, 2015 and onward. The policy will not change current compliance requirements for CIHR funded researchers since a similar policy with the same requirements has been in effect since 2008.

Quick Facts

  • Open access is the practice of providing free and unrestricted online access to research publications.
  • In keeping with the global movement towards open access, the harmonized policy requires that researchers receiving grants from CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC  make their resulting peer-reviewed journal articles freely available online within 12 months of publication.
  • Researchers can comply with the open access policy in two ways: ‘self-archiving’ by depositing their peer-reviewed manuscript to an online repository that will make the manuscript freely accessible within 12 months of publication; or submitting their manuscript to a journal that offers open access within 12 months of publication.
  • CIHR-funded researchers are also required to deposit bioinformatics, atomic, and molecular coordinate data into the appropriate public database immediately upon publication of research results. They must also retain original data sets for a minimum of five years (or longer if other policies apply).
  • Since 2008, SSHRC has invited applications for financial support from open access journals through its Aid to Scholarly Journals funding opportunity. In the 2014 competition, nearly 65% of applicants had an open-access or delayed open-access business model, up from just over 50% in the previous competition.
  • The Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications aligns with the objectives of Canada’s Action Plan on Open Government and is a commitment under the updated Science, Technology, and Innovation Strategy.

Open access publishing resources for faculty:

Scholarly Publishing Resources from Western Libraries – provides links to open access publishing solutions, directories, and open access advocacy groups for researchers at Western and the affiliated colleges including Scholarship@Western

Scholars Portal DataVerse (a repository for research data collected by individuals and organizations associated with Ontario universities)

University of Toronto Libraries Open Access Resources

 

Open Data Resources

Open data is trending right now. Why is this? First, it’s fast becoming a requirement by many Federal granting agencies to ensure publicly funded research results are made accessible and available to the public. Second, many governments and organizations around the world are publishing data sets to build networks, promote innovation, and grow social change. Open data access can come in many forms, the most common being open access publishing and web-based repositories. For university-affiliated researchers and scholars, common questions arise: How and where should I make my research findings publicly available? How much will it cost? Will my data be secure? Should I be concerned about privacy and confidentiality? For some informative solutions, refer to the following links to open data repositories, networks and other resources available to the Canadian research community:

Scholars Portal Dataverse Network 

The Scholars Portal Dataverse network is a repository for research data collected by individuals and organizations associated with Ontario universities. The Dataverse platform makes it easy for researchers to deposit data, create appropriate metadata, and version documents as you work.  (source: SP site).

Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL) Research Dissemination

Scholarship@Western

University of Toronto Libraries Open Data 

Datalibre.ca

Open Data Research Network 

Tri-Agency Open Access Policy (draft stages) FAQs